Posts zu Lehrveranstaltungen von Prof. Dr. Nils Röller (Mediale Künste, DKM, ZHDK)
Akane Tamotsu: Novalis’s note searched from the Internet
(de)
Alles Sichtbare haftet am Unsichtbaren – das Hoerbare am Unhoerbaren – das Fuehlbare am Unfuehlbaren. Viclleicht das Denkbare am Undenkbaren – .
(en)
Everything that is visible clings to the invisible, The audible to the inaudible, The tangible to the intangible, Maybe also the imaginable to the unimaginable.
***
Indeed if we change the view point for something, we can see/find another aspects of it. However sometimes it is not easy, sometimes we cannot, or sometimes even if we can, it makes us more confuse (in this case we may be in the “border”). the (able) visible/audible/tangible/imaginable and (unable) invisible/inaudible/intangible/unimaginable make spiral then if we find an “able”, next we find “unable”, “unable” become “able” then next we find another “unable”…
this is my way to understand Novalis’s word.
***
Mark von Schlegell: “Realometer” – American Romance
“The realometer is like a machine. The realometer reflects the light of the living world of consciousness as it rolls written through recorded time, romancing an ever-changing real.”
(http://www.hkw.de/en/programm/2009/andere2009/veranstaltungen_31440/Veranstaltungsdetail_1_36155.php)That is interesting simile to say American Romance as machine.
In my image, machine is hard, metalic, algorythmic, no warm of human, no spirit, no will, eternally work, only work, … few ‘good’. and also in my image Romance is more lively and human-nature.
then I give it a try to think of the word “system”. Does “system” have human-nature or not? we human have made up a lot of kind of systems, like communication, politics, education,…, and made use of, ran, managed them.
also Machines work along orders by program or stimulation – there are systems.
then there is a common point between human and machine… both exist on some systems and without them we lose order, cannot continue to exist in calm…
still I don’t think Machine is not human nature but “system” is like a bridge between machine and human.
then realometer also has a system which projects human’s lively feelings, and human are the creators of its program. when human’s feelings get together, the flow is made and the flow becomes a big program (similar as Complex Systems!). by the program, the system works, … then he said realometer is like as it rolls ‘written through recorded time’. …
…I’m sorry, I become confused. and my opinion may be out of theme… (I’m studying “Computer Science” at my home university!)
| Print article |
about 5 months ago
Just great thoughts. Thank you! Tobias